Trepanier MacGillis Battina P.A. has four attorneys selected for inclusion in the 2019 edition of Minnesota Super Lawyers ® magazine. TMB shareholder Craig W. Trepanier was named as a Super Lawyer in the areas of Employment and Labor Law: Employer, Employment Litigation: Defense, Business Litigation, and Closely Held Business law. TMB shareholder James C. MacGillis […]
Minnesota Wage Theft Law Takes Effect on July 1, 2019
The State of Minnesota has enacted legislation to prevent “wage theft” that will require employers to take specific steps when it goes into effect on July 1, 2019. The requirements apply to employers in Minnesota with 10 or more employees. Key provisions of the law include: Employers must provide all new employees with a written […]
James C. MacGillis, Firm Profiled in Minnesota Lawyer
Minnesota Lawyer, a weekly publication serving the Minnesota legal community, recently featured an interview with TMB founding shareholder James “Jim” C. MacGillis. The piece, “Business Focus Drives Boutique Firm’s New Leader, written by reporter Todd Nelson, ran on May 9, 2019. The article highlights Jim’s recent election in May 2019 as President of Trepanier MacGillis […]
V. John Ella to Present at MSBA “Duty of Loyalty” CLE in Duluth
The Minnesota State Bar Association’s “Litigating a Breach of Duty of Loyalty Claim” CLE, presented by TMB shareholder V. John Ella, will be held at the Canal Park Lodge in Duluth, Minnesota on May 2, 2019. John’s presentation will address how to effectively litigate breach of duty of loyalty claim. Employers are increasingly asserting claim […]
TMB Welcomes New Attorney Anna M. Koch
Trepanier MacGillis Battina P.A. welcomes associate attorney Anna M. Koch. Anna is a 2018 graduate of the University of Minnesota Law School. She practices in the areas of employment law, business law, commercial litigation, and real estate litigation. Prior to becoming an associate attorney, Anna worked for the firm as a law clerk drafting litigation […]
Minnesota Human Rights Act Clarified by Pair of Supreme Court Decisions
The Minnesota Supreme Court issued two decisions in 2019 interpreting the scope of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”) as to protections against discrimination based on an employee’s disability. Together, the two rulings reinforce the idea that employers in Minnesota need to be both thoughtful and careful when responding to an employee’s request for an […]
Minnesota Employment Contracts Included in Business Deskbook Published by Minnesota CLE
Minnesota CLE has just published its 2019 3rd Edition of Representing the Ongoing Business Deskbook, a comprehensive treatise on Minnesota business law. TMB shareholder V. John Ella co-authored Chapter Four, “Minnesota Employment Contracts” along with attorney Jeffrey B. Oberman. V. John Ella is also the author of Executive Employment Law – A Handbook for Minnesota […]
Minnesota PCA Agencies and Home Health Care Businesses Face Increasing Regulatory Burdens
The Personal Care Assistance (“PCA”) and home health care industry has been rewarding for owners of PCA agencies in Minnesota, some of whom are first-generation immigrants serving a particular demographic or immigrant community. A perfect storm of regulatory changes, however, is making this line of business increasingly challenging. Because Minnesota PCA businesses bill the state’s Medicaid […]
Frequently Asked Questions About the Minnesota Agricultural Equipment Dealership Act
What is the Minnesota Agricultural Equipment Dealership Act? The Minnesota legislature has adopted the Minnesota Agricultural Equipment Dealership Act, Minn. Stat. § 325E.061, et seq. (the “Act” or “MAEDA”), which provides special legal protections to dealers of agricultural equipment. Under the Act, dealers may bring legal action against a manufacturer that violates the Act’s provisions. […]
Court Addresses Shareholder’s Claim that He Had an Expectation of Lifetime Employment in a Minnesota Company
The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued a decision in the case of Roberts v. HydraMetrics, LLC, No. A18-0390, (Minn. Ct. App. 2019) that addressed a shareholder’s claim that he had an expectation of lifetime employment with the Minnesota company for which he worked. The decision both clarifies and criticizes a well-known 1992 Court of Appeals decision that was originally […]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- …
- 35
- Next Page »